Abstract: A series of YAG:Ce,Mn transparent ceramics were prepared via a solid-state reaction-vacuum sintering method. The effects of various Mn2+–Si4+ pair doping levels on the structure, transmittance, and luminescence properties were systematically investigated. These transparent ceramics have average grain sizes of 10–16 μm, clean grain boundaries, and excellent transmittance up to 83.4% at 800 nm. Under the excitation of 460 nm, three obvious emission peaks appear at 533, 590, and 745 nm, which can be assigned to the transition 5d→4f of Ce3+ and 4T1→6A1 of Mn2+. Thus, the Mn2+–Si4+ pairs can effectively modulate the emission spectrum by compensating broad orange-red and red spectrum component to yield high quality warm white light. After the optimized YAG:Ce,Mn transparent ceramic packaged with blue light-emitting diode (LED) chips, correlated color temperature (CCT) as low as 3723 K and luminous efficiency (LE) as high as 96.54 lm/W were achieved, implying a very promising candidate for application in white light-emitting diodes (WLEDs) industry.
Keywords: Mn2+ red-emitting; YAG:Ce,Mn transparent ceramics; white light-emitting diodes (WLEDs) application; low color temperature
1 Introduction
In recent decades, owing to the merits of high luminous efficiency (LE), energy saving, environmental friendliness, and long persistence, white light-emitting diodes (WLEDs)
have become an essential part of our daily life [1–4]. Commercial WLEDs normally utilize 460 nm blue light to excite Y3Al5O12:Ce3+ (YAG:Ce) yellow phosphor dispersed in epoxy or silicone to generate white light, and then white light was achieved through the combinationof yellow and blue light [5,6]. Nonetheless, a variety of disadvantages, such as reduced LE, lower lifetime, the shift of emission color, and corresponding reduced sensory comfort of human eyes, appear due to the poor heat-resistance and thermal conductivity (0.1–0.4 W·m–1·K–1) of these organic materials [7–9]. In addition, the low color rendering index (CRI) value and high correlated color temperature (CCT) value of YAG:Ce-based WLEDs can be caused by the lack of red light component [10]. It is reported that high CCT would affect human health, especially be harmful to human eyes, safety [11], and thereby high performance warm WLEDs with good thermal stability and low CCT value should be systematically studied.
Compared to phosphors, YAG transparent ceramics are one of promising fluorescent matrixes in WLEDs application with high thermal stability due to the low thermal expansion coefficient (8.4×10–6 K–1) and high thermal conductivity (9–14 W·m–1·K–1) [12]. Furthermore, YAG transparent ceramics can be co-doped with rare earth or transition mental ions as activated center in Y3+ or Al3+ positions. Since the acquisition of warm white light requires the enrichment of red color in YAG:Ce-based WLEDs, co-doped red-activated center can be expected to yield ideal emission [13,14]. Research about introducing Cr3+, Pr3+, or Tb3+ ion as red-emitting ions to YAG matrix has been reported [15–17]. A classic example of this was the preparation of YAG:Ce, Pr, Cr transparent ceramic, which possesses high LE of 89.3 lm/W and CRI of 78 by the introduction of red emission band at 609, 638, 677, and 689 nm [15], along with LE of 89 lm/W was achieved by the Ce, Cr co-doped YAG transparent ceramics [16]. Besides, warm white light with a CCT value of ~3000 K and CRI value of 78.9 as well as LE of 38.5–58.9 lm/W was achieved by the transparent ceramics Gd3Al4GaO12:Ce3+(GAGG:Ce3+) when light-emitting diodes (LEDs) were driven at 350 mA [18]. However, the problem of preparing GAGG:Ce3+ ceramics is that Ga volatilizes and decomposes easily in high temperature and vacuum environment, which results in the non-uniform distribution of GAGG:Ce3+ ceramics [19]. To prevent the Ga evaporation at high temperature, a complicated two-step sintering method—oxygen sintering and hot isostatic pressing sintering was proposed to prepare the YAGG:Ce transparent ceramics and then increased the cost [20].
Previous research revealed that Mn2+ can emit red light in a strong crystal field by the 4T1→6A1 transition [21,22]. Consequently, the Mn2+-doped YAG:Ce phosphors showed the improvement of CRI and CCT performance of WLEDs, through the combination of three emission bands centered at 560, 593, and 745 nm, when it is excited by 460 nm blue light [23,24]. Moreover, the Y3–m–nCemMnnAl5–nSinO12 phosphors were also designed by the incorporation of Mn2+–Si4+ pairs and then realized color point tuning for white
light generation [25]. Similarly, the LE of 119.93 lm/W, internal quantum yield of 81.0%, and CRI value of 73.6 as well as CCT value of 5674 K were achieved in a Mn-doped Y3Al5O12:Ce3+ single crystal for WLEDs application [26]. However, it is difficult to prepare large-sized YAG:Ce,Mn single crystal for long production cycle and high cost. Furthermore, the YAG:Ce3+,Mn2+,Si4+ phosphors embedded in glass ceramics (PIGs) were also prepared as a chromatically-tunable luminescent material, in which the CCT and LE reach 4954–3753 K and 80.8–60.3 lm/w, respectively [27]. Moreover, Lu3Al5O12:Mn (LuAG:Mn) transparent ceramics with red-emitting at 600–700 nm have been reported [28]. In summary, optimized emission with low CCT value can be achieved by the strategy of co-doping of Mn2+ in YAG:Ce3+ system. In comparison to emission band of Pr3+ and Cr3+, Mn2+ helps to obtain broad orange-red and red emission band, which is beneficial to reach full-luminescence in the visible range. Although the Mn2+ ions have been widely used in inorganic luminescent materials, to the best of our knowledge, the Mn2+ doped YAG transparent ceramics, as a more efficient fluorescent conversion media for WLEDs application, have not yet been investigated.
In this work, red-emitting YAG:Ce,Mn transparent ceramics with various Mn2+–Si4+ pair doping concentration were successfully fabricated via a solid-state reaction sintering method. Mn2+ ions were introduced to compensate broad orange-red and red spectrum component and achieve full emission band in the visible range under the excitation of 460 nm. Besides, Si4+ ions were introduced to make the charge balance. A combination of X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), fluorescent spectrum, lifetime, and transmittance analysis has been carried out to investigate the microstructure and luminescence properties of YAG:Ce,Mn transparent ceramics in detail. Meanwhile, the effects of Mn2+–Si4+ pair doping concentration on the structure, transmittance, and luminescence properties, and the energy transfer mechanism were discussed. The YAG:Ce,Mn trans-parent ceramics assembled with blue LED chips have tunable emission from cold white to warm white as well as high LE and low CCT, which are promising candidates for warm WLEDs application.
2 Experimental
2. 1 Sample preparation
Y2.994Al5–2yO12:0.006Ce3+,yMn2+,ySi4+ (y = 0, 0.01, 0.03, 0.06, 0.09, 0.12) (YAG:Ce,Mn) transparent ceramics were prepared by a solid-state reaction sintering method. High-purity commercial powder Al2O3 (99.99%), Y2O3 (99.99%), CeO2 (99.95%), MnO (99.95%), and SiO2 (99.9%) were used as raw materials. Among them, Si4+ from SiO2 was introduced to make the charge balance. 0.05 wt% MgO and 0.5 wt% tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS) were used as sintering aids. According to the composition listed in Table 1, raw materials were ball milled for 24 h in ethanol, and then the ethanol slurry was dried at 60 ℃ for 12 h and sieved through a 200-mesh screen. The
fine powder was pressed into pellets (Φ = 40 mm) followed by cold isostatic pressed at 200 MPa. After removing the residual organic at 900 ℃ for 8 h, the compacted pellets were sintered at 1750 ℃ for 8 h under vacuum environment. All the samples were polished to 1 mm for characterization. Besides, Mn2+ singly doped transparent ceramic Y3Al4.76O12:0.12Mn2+, 0.12Si4+ (YAG:Mn) was also prepared as a comparison.
Table 1 Ingredients of Y2.994Al5–2yO12:0.006Ce3+,yMn2+,ySi4+ transparent ceramics
2. 2 Characterization
The crystal structure was characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD, Miniflex600, Rigaku, Japan) with Cu Kα radiation. Microstructures were observed by field emission scanning electron microscope (FESEM, SU-8010, Hitachi, Japan). In-line transmittance curves were measured using a UV/VIS/NIR spectrophotometer(Lambda950, Perkin Elmer, USA). The valance state of Mn ions was demonstrated via X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS, Escalab250Xi, Thermo Fisher, USA). Room-temperature photoluminescence (PL) and photoluminescence excitation (PLE) spectra were tested using a fluorescence spectrophotometer (FLS920,Edinburgh Instruments, UK) equipped with a xenon lamp as the excitation source. Fluorescence decay curves were recorded using a fluorescence spectrophotometer (FLS980, Edinburgh Instruments, UK) equipped with 470 nm laser as the excitation source. These transparent ceramics were packaged with commercial 460 nm blue chips into LED chip-on board (COB) modules and further LED lamps in Zhongkexinyuan Photoelectric Technology Co. (Fuzhou, China). The related room-temperature CCT, LE, and Commission International de L’Eclairage (CIE) chromaticity color coordinates of YAG:Ce,Mn transparent ceramics were measured using an integrating sphere (Everfine PMS-50 system, EVERFINE Corporation, Hangzhou, China).
3 Results and discussion
Figure 1 shows the optical pictures of YAG:Ce,Mn transparent ceramics CM0, CM1, CM2, CM3, CM4, and CM5 (y = 0, 0.01, 0.03, 0.06, 0.09, 0.12), respectively. These ceramic samples were double-polished and displayed homogeneous appearance. The size of these samples is 30 mm in diameter and 1.0 mm in thickness, through which the words on back can be seen clearly. After the introduction of more Mn2+–Si4+ pairs, YAG:Ce,Mn transparent ceramics’ color gradually changes from yellow to red.
Fig. 1 Photograph of transparent ceramics CM0–CM5.
Figure 2 shows the XRD patterns of transparent ceramics CM0–CM5 with various Mn2+–Si4+ pair concentration. It can be seen from Fig. 2 that diffraction peaks of ceramics CM0–CM3 perfectly match with the standard YAG (PDF#33-0040) phase and no secondary phase is detected, indicating Ce3+ and Mn2+–Si4+ pairs have been completely incorporated into YAG crystal lattice when y = 0, 0.01, 0.03, and 0.06. However, several weak diffraction peaks aside from the standard YAG phase appear when y = 0.09 and 0.12, indicating that secondary phase exists in ceramics CM4 and CM5. These peaks match with the standard Mg2SiO4 (PDF#74-1681) phase. The existence of secondary phase would result in inhomogeneous microstructure. Besides, diffraction peaks slightly shift toward to lower angle range with increasing Mn2+–Si4+ pair concentration, suggesting that YAG:Ce,Mn transparent ceramics obtain expanding unit cell. The expanding unit cell may be attributed to bigger ion size of Ce3+ (r = 0.1143 nm) and Mn2+ (r = 0.096 nm) in comparison with Y3+(r = 0.1019 nm) and Al3+ (r = 0.054 nm), although the ion size of Si4+ (r = 0.026 nm) is smaller [15,26].
Fig. 2 XRD patterns of standard YAG crystal and ceramics CM0–CM5.
SEM surface morphologies of YAG:Ce,Mn transparent ceramics via thermal etched method are displayed in Fig. 3. Average grain size of ceramics CM0–CM5 is measured to be 16.4, 15.0, 14.4, 14.0, 11.0, and 10.5 μm, respectively. It is obvious that the addition of Mn2+–Si4+ pairs can significantly affect the average grain size of the YAG:Ce,Mn ceramics. Moreover, it can be seen from Figs. 3(a)–3(d) that ceramics CM0–CM3 have regular crystal grains and clean crystal boundaries without obviously secondary phase and residual pores. However, as y = 0.09 and 0.12, grain boundaries of ceramics CM4 and CM5 gradually broaden (Figs. 3(e) and 3(f)). Thus, it can be reasonably concluded that the coexisting Mg2SiO4 forms a liquid phase during the sintering process and is distributed around grain boundaries due to the excess of Si4+. The reason why that grain boundaries broaden and Mg2SiO4 phase appears is that SiO2 may play the dual role of charge balancer and sintering aids, which would cause the deviation in composition from the stoichiometry of YAG:Ce,Mn ceramics. Additional TEOS as sintering aids was introduced; however, redundant Si4+ would induce secondary phase formation when y = 0.09 and 0.12. Seriously, residual pores are observed in ceramics CM4 and CM5 (Figs. 3(e) and 3(f)), which would reduce the densification and result in lower transmittance. In order to see clearly grain boundaries and pores, the enlarged view of ceramics CM4 and CM5 are shown in Figs. 3(e’) and 3(f’), respectively. One reason why the wider grain boundaries can be seen in Figs. 3(e) and 3(e’) is that the thermal corrosion time is too long and residual pores mainly appear in grain boundaries. This result suggests that the Mn2+–Si4+ pair doping concentration should be optimized to avoid the existence of pores and impurity phase as well as help to improve the density of YAG:Ce,Mn transparent ceramics.
Fig. 3 Thermal etched SEM of surface morphologies: (a) CM0, (b) CM1, (c) CM2, (d) CM3, (e) CM4, (f) CM5, and enlarged views: (e’) CM4 and (f’) CM5.
Figure 4 presents the in-line transmittance spectra of transparent ceramics CM0–CM5 and ceramic M5 (YAG:Mn, Y3Al4.76O12:0.12Mn2+,0.12Si4+). On one hand, as shown in Fig. 4(a), ceramics CM0–CM5 obtain extremely high optical transmittance from 300 to 800 nm. The ceramic CM0 obtains best transmittanceof 83.4% at 800 nm, which almost reaches the theoretical limit (84%) of YAG transparent ceramics. As Mn2+–Si4+ pairs were introduced into the YAG:Ce structure, the transmittance of ceramics CM1, CM2, CM3, CM4, and CM5 reaches 83.3%, 82.5%, 82.3%, 78.4%, and 78.0% at 800 nm, respectively. These results are consistent with SEM results shown in Fig. 3. The lower transmittance of ceramics CM4 and CM5 can be ascribed to inhomogeneous microstructure and residual pores. On the other hand, similar absorption bands around 340 nm and 440–470 nm are observed in ceramics CM0–CM5, which can be attributed to the transition of Ce3+ ions from its 4f ground state to 5d excited state [29]. That indicates YAG:Ce,Mn ceramics can be effectively excited under the 460 nm excitation. Nevertheless, the absorption intensity around 340 nm and 440–470 nm gradually declines with increasing Mn2+–Si4+ pair doping concentration. That would be related to expanding unit cell in YAG:Ce,Mn ceramics
and the energy transfers from Ce3+ to Mn2+. Mn2+ singly doped transparent ceramic M5 was also prepared via the same process. As shown in Fig. 4(b), the in-line
transmittance of 1.0 mm thick ceramic M5 (the inset photo in Fig. 4(b)) is up to 74.3% at 800 nm. No obviously apparent absorption band can be found, especially at 460 nm, indicating that Mn2+ is hard to be directly excited by blue light.
Fig. 4 In-line transmittance spectra: (a) ceramics CM0–CM5 and (b) ceramic M5.
Figure 5 shows the XPS spectra of YAG:Ce,Mn ceramics. Figure 5(a) shows the survey scan of XPS, and it indicates the existence of Y, Al, O, Si, and Mn. Figure 5(b) presents the high-resolution XPS spectrum of Mn 2p of ceramic CM5. Two separate peaks with the binding energy of 641.5 and 653.1 eV belong to the Mn 2p3/2 and Mn 2p1/2, respectively, with energy difference of 11.6 eV. These values reveal that Mn2+ exists in YAG:Ce,Mn ceramic samples, which is consistent with that of Mn2+ in MgY2Al4SiO12:Ce3+,Mn2+ phosphor [30].
Fig. 5 XPS spectra of YAG:Ce,Mn ceramic: (a) XPS survey scan and (b) Mn 2p.
Figure 6 presents the PL and PLE spectra of ceramic CM0, CM5, and M5. The PL spectrum of ceramic CM0 exhibits a typical Ce3+ yellow-green broad band centered at 533 nm (Fig. 6(a)), which can be attributed to the 5d→4f transition of Ce3+ in YAG matrix [5,6,15]. These two excitation bands centered at 340 and 460 nm are corresponding to absorption bands in transmittance spectrum, respectively. And the excitation intensity at 460 nm is stronger than that of 340 nm for the reason that YAG:Ce,Mn ceramics obtain higher absorption for blue light. After Mn2+–Si4+ pairs were introduced into the YAG:Ce ceramics, it can be seen from Fig. 6(b) that two obvious emission bands aside from Ce3+ emission band are observed at 590 and 745 nm, which is similar to the PL spectrum of Mn2+-doped YAG phosphors and PIGs phosphor [27,28,31]. As for the emission band of Mn2+ at 528 nm, its intensity is so weak in comparison to strong Ce3+ emission intensity that it cannot be observed. Besides, it is commonly accepted that Mn with different valences emit different luminescence properties. Aside from the aforementioned emission wavelength of Mn2+ ions, Mn3+ emission bands are observed peaked at 608 and 760 nm attributed to 5T2 → 5E transition and Mn4+ emission bands are observed peaked at 668 nm attributed to 2E→4A2 [26,28]. In this work, the luminescence wavelength of Mn3+ and Mn4+ can not be observed and it is worth noting that Mn2+ is oxidized little or nothing in the vacuum environment, and thus almost Mn2+ ions exist in YAG:Ce,Mn transparent ceramics. That is consistent with the XPS results. These PLE spectra of ceramic CM5 monitored at 533, 590, and 745 nm show a similar shape, further supporting the energy transfers from Ce3+ to Mn2+. Moreover, several weak bands are
observed in PLE spectrum in the wavelength from 300 to 500 nm. Figure 6(c) shows the PL and PLE spectrum of ceramic M5 and its PL spectrum exhibits three emission bands of Mn2+ around 528, 590, and 745 nm, further supporting the existence of Mn2+ ions. In addition, the same excitation bands centered at 375, 408, 425, 450, and 468 nm are observed via monitored Mn2+ emission wavelength at 590 nm, corresponding to transition of 6A1(6S) ground state to 4T2(4D), [4A1(4G),4E(4G)], 4T2(4G), and 4T1(4G) excited state, respectively [23,25,32].
Fig. 6 PL and PLE spectra: (a) ceramic CM0, (b) ceramic CM5, and (c) ceramic M5.
Figure 7 shows the PL spectra of ceramics CM0–CM5. All samples achieve a broad band of Ce3+ ions centered at 533 nm under the excitation of 460 nm. After the introduction of Mn2+–Si4+ pairs, two emission bands of Mn2+ are maximized at 590 and 745 nm. Furthermore, with increasing Mn2+–Si4+ pair concentration, the emission intensity of Ce3+ declines, but that of Mn2+ increases monotonously. These results are related to the reduced absorption of Ce3+ around 440–470 nm
with increasing Mn2+–Si4+ pair content, which gives strong evidence of the energy transfer from Ce3+ to Mn2+ ions. Although the doping value y is up to 0.12, the emission intensity of Mn2+ at around 745 nm is still weak. It is acknowledged that the wavelength of 745 nm is insensitive to human eyes due to adjacent infrared region. Hence, after optimizing Mn2+ doping concentration, the Mn2+ doping can enrich red light component and help tune the color point toward red region via emission maximized at 590 nm, which is greatly beneficial to obtain desirable CCT value and then generate warm white light.
Fig. 7 PL spectra of transparent ceramics CM0–CM5 under 460 nm excitation.
Figure 8 presents the fluorescence decay curves of ceramics CM0–CM5. Under 470 nm laser light excitation, decay curves were recorded via monitoring Ce3+ emission peak at 533 nm. Their average lifetime of ceramics CM0–CM5 were calculated to be 74, 63, 58, 53, 48, and 46 ns, respectively, and therefore a fluorescence decay process takes place quickly in Ce3+ and Mn2+–Si4+ pair co-doped system, which reveals the mechanism of energy transfer between Ce3+ and Mn2+ and it is similar to Ref. [27]. In addition, the energy transfer efficiency (ηT) of Ce3+→Mn2+ in YAG:Ce,Mn transparent ceramic should be taken into consideration. According to the average lifetime, ηT can be obtained from the formula [25,33]:
ηT = 1 – τ/τ0 (1)
where τ is the average lifetime of the donor Ce3+ ions in the presence of the acceptor Mn2+ ions and τ0 is the average lifetime of the donor Ce3+ ions without acceptor Mn2+ ions. Then, the ηT of various YAG:Ce,Mn transparent ceramics was calculated and listed in Table 2. In this work, the ηT shows an enhancement as the increasingly rise of Mn2+–Si4+ content and reaches 37.8% when y = 0.12, which reveals the energy transfer from Ce3+ to Mn2+ ions and results in reduced emission intensity of Ce3+ ions as well as increased emission intensity of Mn2+ ions.
Fig. 8 Fluorescence decay curves of the Ce3+ emission peaked at 533 under 470 nm excitation of the ceramics CM0–CM5.
Table 2 Energy transfer efficiency of Ce3+→Mn2+ in YAG:Ce,Mn transparent ceramics
According to the PL spectra and fluorescence decay curves as well as Refs. [23,26,27], the energy transfer process in YAG:Ce,Mn transparent ceramics can be illustrated as Fig. 9. After Ce3+ replaced Y3+ position, its 4f ground state splits to 2F5/2 and 2F7/2 energy level due to spin-coupling. Also, energy splitting of 5d excited state occurs. Under the excitation of 460 nm, the electronic state of Ce3+ is excited to upper 5d state. Next, a rapid electron relaxation process takes place from 5d state to 2F5/2 and 2F7/2 energy level, which emits a broad yellow-green band centered at 533 nm. Because the lowest 5d1 energy level of Ce3+ is a little higher than the 4T1 of Mn2+, the energy transfer process takes place easily from Ce3+ to neighboring Mn2+ via non-radiation transition. And then the 4T1 excited electrons transfer back to 6A1 ground state, which emits three bands at 528, 590, and 745 nm since the local environment around the Mn2+ ions differ. Such spin-forbidden transition with broad bands would be beneficial for the full emission spectrum in the visible range.
Fig. 9 Schematic illustration of the energy transfer process in the YAG:Ce,Mn transparent ceramics.
In order to evaluate the illumination performance of these transparent ceramics, ceramics CM0–CM5 were combined with commercial blue LED chips. Table 3 shows the value of CCT, LE, and CIE chromaticity color coordinates. Ceramic CM0 shows the highest CCT (4044 K) due to the deficiency of red spectrum, although the LE is the highest. As Mn2+–Si4+ pairs were introduced, the CCT and LE simultaneously decrease. Among them, transparent ceramics CM1–CM3 with proper CCT of 3933–3402 K and LE of 103.46–68.79 lm/W are promising fluorescent materials for warm WLEDs application. In comparison to YAG:Ce ceramics, the LE of YAG:Ce,Mn fluorescent ceramics inevitably decreases on account of energy transfer between Ce3+ and Mn2+. However, YAG:Ce,Mn ceramics obtain low CCT value and achieve warm white light. That is good for the health of human eyes. Figure 10(a) shows CIE chromaticity color coordinates diagram of ceramics CM0–CM5 as these transparent ceramics were excited by 460 nm blue light. With increasing Mn2+–Si4+ pair doping concentration, their color coordinates ranging from (0.425, 0.552) to (0.474, 0.507) mean emission color can shift from yellow-green to orange and the enrichment of red spectrum component. As a result, it is promising to achieve high quality warm white light via YAG:Ce,Mn ceramics when combined with blue LEDs. Figure 10(b) presents the optical picture of transparent ceramics CM0 and CM2 fabricated in COB modules. After encapsulating lampshade, Fig. 10(c) shows the luminescent result of related turn-on LED lamps. These two LED lamps all emit bright light, but Lamp B based on ceramic CM0 emits cold white light. The high quality warm white light can be obtained from the Lamp A based on ceramic CM2 with CCT of 3723 K and LE of 96.54 lm/W, which is superior to other reported of Ce3+ and red activated ion co-doped ceramic-based warm WLEDs.
Table 3 CCT, LE, and CIE chromaticity color coordinates of transparent ceramics CM0–CM5 packaged with LEDs
Fig. 10 (a) CIE chromaticity color coordinate diagram for transparent ceramics CM0–CM5 excited by 460 nm blue LED chips, (b) the photo of ceramics CM2 and CM0
LED COB modules, and (c) the photo of related turn-on LED lamps.
4 Conclusions
In summary, YAG:Ce,Mn transparent ceramics with excellent luminescence properties have been successfully prepared. The effects of Mn2+–Si4+ pair doping concentration on microstructure, optical, and luminescence properties were systematically discussed. Mn2+ ions can enrich red spectrum component via the broad emission bands centered at 590 and 745 nm. The transmittance analysis, PL and PLE spectrum, as well as fluorescence lifetime prove energy transfer from Ce3+ to Mn2+. Finally, warm white LED lighting was achieved via optimized Mn2+–Si4+ doping. Chromaticity color coordinates of YAG:Ce,Mn ceramics can be varied from (0.425, 0.552) to (0.474, 0.507) by controlling the Mn2+–Si4+ doping concentration. The LED light source with high LE (96.54 lm/W) and low CCT (3723 K) was accomplished packaged with YAG:Ce,Mn transparent ceramic CM2 (y = 0.03). The present work demonstrates the promising application of YAG:Ce,Mn transparent ceramics in the field of warm WLEDs. In order to improve the LE of YAG:Ce,Mn packaged LED, the introduction of Al2O3 scattering centers is an excellent strategy and the related work is on-going.
References
[1] Nishiura S, Tanabe S, Fujioka K, et al. Preparation and optical properties of transparent Ce: YAG ceramics for high power white LED. IOP Conf Ser: Mater Sci Eng 2009, 1: 012031.
[2] Chen ZH, Li JT, Xu JJ, et al. Fabrication of YAG transparent ceramics by two-step sintering. Ceram Int 2008, 34: 1709–1712.
[3] Samuel P, Kumar GA, Takagimi Y, et al. Efficient energy transfer between Ce3+/Cr3+ and Nd3+ ions in transparent Nd/Ce/Cr: YAG ceramics. Opt Mater 2011, 34: 303–307.
[4] Lin ZB, Lin H, Xu J, et al. Highly thermal-stable warm w-LED based on Ce: YAG PiG stacked with a red phosphor layer. J Alloys Compd 2015, 649: 661–665.
[5] Hu S, Lu CH, Zhou GH, et al. Transparent YAG: Ce ceramics for WLEDs with high CRI: Ce3+ concentration and sample thickness effects. Ceram Int 2016, 42: 6935–6941.
[6] Liu GH, Zhou ZZ, Shi Y, et al. Ce: YAG transparent ceramics for applications of high power LEDs: Thickness effects and high temperature performance. Mater Lett 2015, 139: 480–482.
[7] Nishiura S, Tanabe S, Fujioka K, et al. Properties of transparent Ce: YAG ceramic phosphors for white LED. Opt Mater 2011, 33: 688–691.
[8] Yun S, Wu LX, Chen H, et al. Study of Ce: Y3Al5O12 transparent ceramics for application of white light emiting diode. Laser Optoelectron Prog 2014, 51: 052302.
[9] Lin H, Hu T, Cheng Y, et al. Glass ceramic phosphors: Towards long-lifetime high-power white light-emittingdiode applications-A review. Laser Photonics Rev 2018, 12: 1700344.
[10] Yi XZ, Zhou SM, Chen C, et al. Fabrication of Ce: YAG, Ce, Cr: YAG and Ce: YAG/Ce, Cr: YAG dual-layered composite phosphor ceramics for the application of white LEDs. Ceram Int 2014, 40: 7043–7047.
[11] Zhang MH, Chen Y, He GX. Color temperature tunable white-light LED cluster with extrahigh color rendering index. Sci World J 2014, 2014: 1–6.
[12] Li SX, Zhu QQ, Tang DM, et al. Al2O3–YAG: Ce composite phosphor ceramic: A thermally robust and efficient color converter for solid state laser lighting. J Mater Chem C 2016, 4: 8648–8654.
[13] Yang H, Kim YS. Energy transfer-based spectral properties of Tb-, Pr-, or Sm-codoped YAG: Ce nanocrystalline phosphors. J Lumin 2008, 128: 1570–1576.
[14] Lin YS, Cheng TC, Tsai CC, et al. High-luminance whitelight point source using Ce, Sm : YAG double-clad crystal fiber. IEEE Photon Technol Lett 2010, 22: 1494–1496.
[15] Feng SW, Qin HM, Wu GQ, et al. Spectrum regulation of YAG: Ce transparent ceramics with Pr, Cr doping for white light emitting diodes application. J Eur Ceram Soc 2017, 37: 3403–3409.
[16] Tang YR, Zhou SM, Yi XZ, et al. The Cr-doping effect on white light emitting properties of Ce: YAG phosphor ceramics. J Am Ceram Soc 2017, 100: 2590–2595.
[17] Mu ZF, Hu YH, Wu HY, et al. Luminescence and energy transfer of Mn2+ and Tb3+ in Y3Al5O12 phosphors. J Alloys Compd 2011, 509: 6476–6480.
[18] Liu S, Sun P, Liu YF, et al. Warm white light with a high color-rendering index from a single Gd3Al4GaO12: Ce3+ transparent ceramic for high-power LEDs and LDs. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2019, 11: 2130–2139.
[19] Hellstrom EE, Ray RD, Zhang C. Preparation of gadolinium gallium garnet [Gd3Ga5O12] by solid-state reaction of the oxides. J Am Ceram Soc 1989, 72: 1376–1381.
[20] Hua H, Feng S, Ouyang Z, et al. YAGG:Ce transparent ceramics with high luminous efficiency for solid-state lighting application. J Adv Ceram 2019, 8: 389–398.
[21] Palumbo DT, Brown JJ. Electronic states of Mn2+-activated phosphors. J Electrochem Soc 1971, 118: 1159.
[22] Li GG, Xu XG, Peng C, et al. Yellow-emitting NaCaPO4: Mn2+ phosphor for field emission displays. Opt Express 2011, 19: 16423.
[23] Shi YR, Wang YH, Wen Y, et al. Tunable luminescence Y3Al5O12: 006Ce3+, xMn2+ phosphors with different charge compensators for warm white light emitting diodes. Opt Express 2012, 20: 21656.
[24] Wang XJ, Jia DD, Yen WM. Mn2+ activated green, yellow, and red long persistent phosphors. J Lumin 2003, 102–103: 34–37.
[25] Jia YC, Huang YJ, Zheng YH, et al. Color point tuning of Y3Al5O12 : Ce3+ phosphor via Mn2+–Si4+ incorporation for white light generation. J Mater Chem 2012, 22: 15146.
[26] Gu GR, Xiang WD, Yang C, et al. Synthesis and luminescence properties of a H2 annealed Mn-doped Y3Al5O12: Ce3+ single crystal for WLEDs. CrystEngComm 2015, 17: 4554–4561.
[27] Chen H, Lin H, Xu J, et al. Chromaticity-tunable phosphor-in-glass for long-lifetime high-power warm w-LEDs. J Mater Chem C 2015, 3: 8080–8089.
[28] Zhang YL, Hu S, Liu YL, et al. Red-emitting Lu3Al5O12: Mn transparent ceramic phosphors: Valence state evolution studies of Mn ions. Ceram Int 2018, 44: 23259–23262.
[29] Jang HS, Im WB, Lee DC, et al. Enhancement of red spectral emission intensity of Y3Al5O12: Ce3+ phosphor via Pr co-doping and Tb substitution for the application to white LEDs. J Lumin 2007, 126: 371–377.
[30] Pan ZF, Chen JC, Wu HQ, et al. Red emission enhancement in Ce3+/Mn2+ co-doping suited garnet host MgY2Al4SiO12 for tunable warm white LED. Opt Mater 2017, 72: 257–264.
[31] Chen DQ, Zhou Y, Xu W, et al. Enhanced luminescence of Mn4+: Y3Al5O12 red phosphor via impurity doping. J Mater Chem C 2016, 4: 1704–1712.
[32] Chang CK, Chen TM. White light generation under violet-blue excitation from tunable green-to-red emitting Ca2MgSi2O7: Eu, Mn through energy transfer. Appl Phys Lett 2007, 90: 161901.
[33] Song YH, Jia G, Yang M, et al. Sr3Al2O5Cl2: Ce3+, Eu2+: A potential tunable yellow-to-white-emitting phosphor for ultraviolet light emitting diodes. Appl Phys Lett 2009, 94: 091902.
